Top5 Amazing Unsettling Disney Theories That Make You Foolish

Whether you are a big Disney fan or a skeptic, you might need to rethink what you know about Disney. Today, we will explore unsettling Disney theories. Which uncover Disney films and stories, which could make you question everything you thought you knew. So Let’s began and remember our childhood memories.

5) Aladdin

One of the unsettling Disney theories is about Aladdin. In the story, Aladdin wishes to become a prince to win Princess Jasmine’s love. Some believe the genie made Aladdin part of a royal family in Agrabah to fulfill his wish. This would mean that Jasmine and Aladdin are actually siblings, making the situation quite disturbing. However, Aladdin is introduced as Prince Ali of Ababwa, suggesting that he is not connected to Jasmine’s family.

Still, this theory raises other questions about what it means for Aladdin to be a genuine prince. The genie could have either overthrown an existing kingdom or created a new one entirely, raising concerns about how this new realm was populated and what happened to it when Jafar reversed the wish.

4) Lilo & Stitch

One of the unsettling Disney theories comes from “Lilo & Stitch. ” Lilo is late to her hula lesson because she visits Pudge the fish, whom she believes controls the weather. This strange detail may hide a deeper story. Lilo’s parents died in a car accident during a storm, and she might blame Pudge for that tragedy. Some fans suggest that Pudge could actually be Maui, the demigod from “Moana,”

in disguise. Given that both stories take place in Hawaii, it’s possible for Maui, who can shapeshift and control the weather, to be involved. This perspective makes Maui’s cheerful song “You’re Welcome” seem darker when considering the tragedy associated with the storm.

3) Tarzan

One of the unsettling Disney theories is Tarzan. Tarzan’s iconic loin cloth has puzzled fans for years. Raised by gorillas in the jungle, it raises the question of why Tarzan would wear clothing when the animals around him do not. A scientific theory suggests that due to humans having larger genitals compared to other great apes, Tarzan may have faced teasing or aggression from his gorilla family.

To avoid conflict and fit in, he might have created a loin cloth to cover himself. This idea shows that the loin cloth is more about social adaptation than modesty, highlighting that some things are too noticeable to be left uncovered.

2) Mother Gothel

One of the unsettling Disney theories connects Mother Gothel from “Tangled” and Megara from “Hercules. ” While they are presented as different characters living centuries apart, similarities between their stories suggest they might be the same person. In “Tangled,” Flynn Rider mentions that Mother Gothel has lived for centuries by using the magical power of the sundrop flower, which could symbolize something greater, possibly linked to the sun of a god. The glowing flower in “Tangled” resembles scenes from “Hercules,” where’s Hercules is referred to as a sunspot.

This theory proposes that after Hercules chose a mortal life and died, Meg became obsessed with the flower, representing a piece of Hercules. Her heartbreak could have led her to become the bitter and selfish Gothel. The sundrop flower could maintain Gothel’s youth while holding a connection to Hercules. A shared line between the two characters raises more questions about this theory.

However, another possibility suggests that Gothel might actually be the evil queen from “Snow White. ” Both characters are obsessed with youth and utilize magic to maintain it. Gothel’s finding of the sundrop flower at the bottom of a cliff and her dark cloak create a link with the evil queen, whose fate is also ambiguous. Still, this theory faces timeline challenges, as “Snow White” is set around the 1500s and “Tangled” later, complicating the idea of Gothel being the same character.

1) The Lion King

One of the unsettling Disney theories is The Lion King from 1994. A question has arisen over time about what happened to Mufasa’s body after his tragic fall. The last image of Mufasa shows Scar beside him while Simba runs away from the hyenas. Later, Scar is seen in a cage, using bone fragments to pick his teeth and holding a skull, which some believe belongs to Mufasa. This theory suggests that Scar not only caused Mufasa’s death but might have even eaten him and kept the bones as trophies.

While Scar’s scene suggests he retained the skull, the film also shows the hyenas eating Scar after his defeat, implying they might have consumed Mufasa’s remains, which raises unsettling questions about the nature of these events. Hyenas are known to consume lion carcasses, potentially leaving no recognizable skull. Thus, it brings Scar’s actions into question as some research indicates lions can eat other lions, though this is rare and usually happens in special circumstances.

Alternatively, some argue the skull might resemble that of a baboon rather than a lion, suggesting it may be symbolic rather than literal. The Lion King is inspired by Shakespeare’s Hamlet, which features a famous scene with a skull. Ultimately, Scar’s cunning nature makes it plausible that he could have kept his brother’s skull as a dark memento. What do you think?